Jesus M. v. Quintero v. The United States of America

409 F.2d 839, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12864
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 11, 1969·No. 22491·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Quintero was convicted on three counts involving the importation and transportation of untaxed heroin. We affirm.

The evidence was sufficient. This is a much stronger case than Ramirez v. United States, 9 Cir., 363 F.2d 33, upon which Quintero relies. Here there were act, word and conduct on the part of Quintero which were found wanting in Ramirez.

A contention was and is made by Quintero that Galindo, a joint actor, did not properly waive his Fifth Amendment rights when he testified. We cannot agree. If Galindo had been believed, his testimony was all favorable to Quintero. Furthermore, Galindo’s privilege was not Quintero’s.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jesus M. v. Quintero v. The United States of America, 409 F.2d 839, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12864 (9th Cir. 1969).

409 F.2d 839 (Jesus M. v. Quintero v. The United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Carl Skolek
474 F.2d 582 (Tenth Circuit, 1973)