Jesus Gonzalez v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 14, 2022
Docket07-22-00061-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jesus Gonzalez v. the State of Texas (Jesus Gonzalez v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jesus Gonzalez v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-22-00061-CV

JESUS GONZALEZ, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 222nd District Court Oldham County, Texas Trial Court No. OCR-17G-027, Honorable Roland D. Saul, Presiding

April 14, 2022 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and DOSS, JJ.

Appellant, Jesus Gonzalez, a Texas inmate proceeding pro se, filed a notice of

appeal from the trial court’s order denying “Defendant’s Motion to the Trial Court

Requesting to Rescind its Prior Order to Withdraw Funds.” By letter of March 14, 2022,

we directed Gonzalez to pay the required filing fee or, in lieu thereof, to comply with

Chapter 14 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code by filing an affidavit of indigence, an

affidavit relating to previous filings, and a certified copy of his inmate trust account

statement. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 14.002(a), 14.004; Harrell v. State, 286 S.W.3d 315, 319 (Tex. 2009) (holding that “proceedings to withdraw funds from

inmate trust accounts are civil in nature”). We advised Gonzalez that this appeal was

subject to dismissal if he did not comply by March 24, 2022. Gonzalez has since filed an

affidavit of indigence. But, to date, neither an affidavit describing his previous filings nor

a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement has been filed.

Providing all three items is mandatory, and failing to do so authorizes the dismissal

of the appeal or original proceeding. See In re Denson, No. 07-20-00191-CV, 2020 Tex.

App. LEXIS 6966, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Aug. 27, 2020, orig. proceeding) (per

curiam) (mem. op.). Because Gonzalez failed to comply with all the requirements of

Chapter 14 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code within the time provided for

compliance, we dismiss his appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrell v. State
286 S.W.3d 315 (Texas Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jesus Gonzalez v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesus-gonzalez-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.