Jesus Daniel Regalado v. Kingston Data & Credit

District Court, C.D. California·Decided May 28, 2024·No. 5:23-cv-01636·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JESUS DANIEL REGALADO CASE NO: 5:23−cv−01636−FMO−SP Plaintiff(s), v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION Defendant(s). Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 45, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). Dated The 28th of May 2024 /s/

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jesus Daniel Regalado v. Kingston Data & Credit, (C.D. Cal. 2024).

Jesus Daniel Regalado v. Kingston Data & Credit (Jesus Daniel Regalado v. Kingston Data & Credit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Link v. Wabash Railroad
370 U.S. 626 (Supreme Court, 1962)