Jesus D. Cantu v. Fred G. Esquivel, Ii
This text of Jesus D. Cantu v. Fred G. Esquivel, Ii (Jesus D. Cantu v. Fred G. Esquivel, Ii) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-10-00646-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
JESUS D. CANTU, Appellant,
v.
FRED G. ESQUIVEL, II, Appellee.
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Hidalgo County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
This case is before the Court on a joint motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(B). The parties have reached an
agreement with regard to the disposition of the matters currently on appeal. Pursuant to
agreement, the parties request this Court to set aside the trial court=s judgment without regards to the merits, and remand this case to the trial court for rendition of a judgment in
accordance with the agreement of the parties.
The Court has considered the motion and it is the Court=s opinion that the motion
should be granted in part and denied in part.1 The joint motion to set aside and remand
is GRANTED. Accordingly, we set aside the trial court=s judgment without regard to the
merits, and REMAND this case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance
with the parties= agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).
Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent
agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 10th day of March, 2011.
1 Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a) permits the appellate court to dispose of an appeal in accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). This joint motion requests dismissal of the appeal and remand for entry of further orders by the trial court in accordance with the settlement. While this Court may dismiss an appeal pursuant to an agreement by the parties, we are not permitted to dismiss and remand for further proceedings. See id., 42.1(a)(2)(B).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jesus D. Cantu v. Fred G. Esquivel, Ii, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesus-d-cantu-v-fred-g-esquivel-ii-texapp-2011.