Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Jesus Condom v. State of Florida

Jesus Condom v. State of Florida

189 So. 3d 859, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17897, 2015 WL 7571482
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 25, 2015
Docket4D15-2440
StatusPublished

This text of 189 So. 3d 859 (Jesus Condom v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jesus Condom v. State of Florida, 189 So. 3d 859, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17897, 2015 WL 7571482 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

. Jesus Condom appeals the trial court’s denial of his rule 3.801 motion for correction of jail credit. We affirm because Condom does not claim that he is entitled to additional credit for time served in county jail before sentencing as provided in section 921.161, Florida Statutes (2015), See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(a). This decision is without prejudice to Condom’s right to seek relief through the administrative remedies of the Department of Corrections. See Banks v. State, 793 So.2d 132, 132-33 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Rood v. State, 790 So.2d 1192, 1193 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

Affirmed without prejudice.

CIKLIN, C.J., STEVENSON and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Banks v. State
793 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Rood v. State
790 So. 2d 1192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 So. 3d 859, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17897, 2015 WL 7571482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesus-condom-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2015.