Jesus A. Carrion v. Aluminum Company of America

Court of Appeals of Texas

Jesus A. Carrion v. Aluminum Company of America

DecidedApril 7, 2005

Docket13-04-00507-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Jesus A. Carrion v. Aluminum Company of America (Jesus A. Carrion v. Aluminum Company of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jesus A. Carrion v. Aluminum Company of America, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-04-507-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

JESUS A. CARRION, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA, ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 117th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, JESUS A. CARRION, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 00-02205-B. No clerk’s record has been filed due to appellants’ failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On December 20, 2004, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellants were given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellants.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants’ failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this Court’s notice, and appellants’ failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 7^th day of April, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-04-507-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

JESUS A. CARRION, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA, ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 117th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, JESUS A. CARRION, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 00-02205-B. No clerk’s record has been filed due to appellants’ failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On December 20, 2004, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellants were given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellants.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants’ failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this Court’s notice, and appellants’ failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 7^th day of April, 2005.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jesus A. Carrion v. Aluminum Company of America, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesus-a-carrion-v-aluminum-company-of-america-texapp-2005.