Jesup v. Carnegie
This text of 13 Jones & S. 310 (Jesup v. Carnegie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The respondents move upon affidavits to dismiss this appeal. The' affidavits show that while this appeal was pending, all the defendants were permitted by stipulation to deposit and did deposit bonds to an amount less than the amount of security specified by the Code. By so doing, these defendants have finally disposed of the subject-matter of appeal, and have waived any right they might have had, to claim that the discretion of the court should be exercised on their behalf, by reducing or limiting the amount of security.
The motion to dismiss appeal is granted, with $10 costs and disbursements, if any, to be taxed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Jones & S. 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesup-v-carnegie-nysuperctnyc-1879.