Jessup v. . Nixon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Jessup v. . Nixon

136 S.E. 926, 193 N.C. 830, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 471

DecidedFebruary 23, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 136 S.E. 926 (Jessup v. . Nixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jessup v. . Nixon, 136 S.E. 926, 193 N.C. 830, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 471 (N.C. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

*831 Per Curiam.

.This case was before us at the Fall Term, 1923, and is reported in 186 N. C., 100. The defendant’s exception to the refusal of the trial court to grant his motion for judgment as of nonsuit was duly presented on the original hearing, but-was not sustained. Certain peremptory instructions were held to be erroneous. Hence, the necessary effect of the rulings was to remand the cause for a new trial, the appeal being from a judgment rendered on a verdict of the jury, and the demurrer to the evidence not being sustained.

Affirmed.

Connor, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*831 Per Curiam.

.This case was before us at the Fall Term, 1923, and is reported in 186 N. C., 100. The defendant’s exception to the refusal of the trial court to grant his motion for judgment as of nonsuit was duly presented on the original hearing, but-was not sustained. Certain peremptory instructions were held to be erroneous. Hence, the necessary effect of the rulings was to remand the cause for a new trial, the appeal being from a judgment rendered on a verdict of the jury, and the demurrer to the evidence not being sustained.

Affirmed.

Connor, J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S.E. 926, 193 N.C. 830, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jessup-v-nixon-nc-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack