Jessup v. Eldridge

1 N.J.L. 460
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1795
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.J.L. 460 (Jessup v. Eldridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jessup v. Eldridge, 1 N.J.L. 460 (N.J. 1795).

Opinion

Kinsey, C. J.

If the paper had been delivered to the jury at the bar without consent', it would have been error; and—

Pee Cue.

The judgment must be reversed, because it appears that this paper, although of little or no consequence, yet relating to the cause, was delivered to the jury after they had retired, and under a deception.

Judgment reversed.

Davenport, for plaintiff in certiorari.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.J.L. 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jessup-v-eldridge-nj-1795.