Jessup v. Eldridge
1 N.J.L. 460
Opinion
If the paper had been delivered to the jury at the bar without consent', it would have been error; and—
The judgment must be reversed, because it appears that this paper, although of little or no consequence, yet relating to the cause, was delivered to the jury after they had retired, and under a deception.
Judgment reversed.
Davenport, for plaintiff in certiorari.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jessup v. Eldridge, 1 N.J.L. 460 (N.J. 1795).
1 N.J.L. 460 (Jessup v. Eldridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.