Jessup v. American Kennel Club

Second Circuit

Jessup v. American Kennel Club

210 F.3d 111, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6948

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 18, 2000

Docket1999

StatusPublished

This text of 210 F.3d 111 (Jessup v. American Kennel Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jessup v. American Kennel Club, 210 F.3d 111, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6948 (2d Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

210 F.3d 111 (2nd Cir. 2000)

H. PRICE JESSUP, LINDA VAUGHN, SALLY A. KELLY, SUSAN OWENS, ANNETTE WATKINS and NANCY HOPE LOVE, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
THE AMERICAN KENNEL CLUB, INC. and LABRADOR RETRIEVER CLUB, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 99-9111
August Term, 1999

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

Argued: April 11, 2000
Decided: April 18, 2000

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Thomas P. Griesa, then-Chief Judge, dismissing antitrust complaint alleging that defendants' setting of height standards for championship Labrador Retrievers violated the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1 and 2.

Affirmed.

DAVID WALTER SCHNARE, Stafford, Virginia (George E. Marzloff, Stafford, Virginia, on the brief), for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

DALE C. CHRISTENSEN, JR., New York, New York (Mark D. Kotwick, Seward & Kissell, New York, New York, Marshall Simonds, Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, Boston, Massachusetts, on the brief), for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: NEWMAN, KEARSE, and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in then-Chief Judge Griesa's opinion reported at 61 F.Supp.2d 5 (S.D.N.Y. 1999).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI