Jessie James Lunnermon v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary

440 F.2d 774, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10656
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 19, 1971·No. 14470·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This ease was here once before on a record that left substantial doubt as to Lunnermon’s physical condition at the time of his confession. Accordingly, we remanded the case to the District Court to take further evidence and make additional findings. On remand, the District Judge received the hospital records and the testimony of a physician who had attended Lunnermon before and just after the confession. On the basis of the additional evidence, the District Judge found that Lunnermon was in good physical condition at the time of the confession and had received no medication which would have affected in any way his will or his mental processes, 310 F.Supp. 323.

Since the expanded record furnishes a basis for the District Court’s findings, the findings are not clearly erroneous. We accept them and affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jessie James Lunnermon v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary, 440 F.2d 774, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10656 (4th Cir. 1971).

440 F.2d 774 (Jessie James Lunnermon v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toliver v. Gathright
501 F. Supp. 148 (E.D. Virginia, 1980)
John Calvin Johnson v. Walter M. Riddle
562 F.2d 312 (Fourth Circuit, 1977)
State v. Grant
511 P.2d 1013 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1973)