Jessie G. McKnight v. Ella Neal and John H. Simms

D.C. Circuit

Jessie G. McKnight v. Ella Neal and John H. Simms

320 F.2d 750, 116 U.S. App. D.C. 28, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4986

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 1963

Docket17438_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 320 F.2d 750 (Jessie G. McKnight v. Ella Neal and John H. Simms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jessie G. McKnight v. Ella Neal and John H. Simms, 320 F.2d 750, 116 U.S. App. D.C. 28, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4986 (D.C. Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Court directed a verdict against appellant whose car had run into the rear of a car owned and driven by the appellee Simms. There was evidence to the effect that Simms had stopped his car in the center of the Baltimore-Washington Parkway and was backing up to aid a friend in changing a tire. There was also evidence to the effect that two cars ahead of appellant’s car had swerved in order to avoid colliding with the Simms car. There was evidence that appellant may have delayed unduly long in applying brakes to avoid a collision with the Simms ear.

In view of allegations and evidence of negligence of appellee Simms, including violation or violations of Maryland statutes, and the evidence of possible negligence of appellant, the record presents conflicting versions of the events the resolution of which involves passing on credibility of witnesses and reconciling conflicts in the description of events which occurred within a few seconds. These are not issues which may be withdrawn from the jury. Therefore the judgment of the District Court must be vacated and the case remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The District Court directed a verdict against appellant whose car had run into the rear of a car owned and driven by the appellee Simms. There was evidence to the effect that Simms had stopped his car in the center of the Baltimore-Washington Parkway and was backing up to aid a friend in changing a tire. There was also evidence to the effect that two cars ahead of appellant’s car had swerved in order to avoid colliding with the Simms car. There was evidence that appellant may have delayed unduly long in applying brakes to avoid a collision with the Simms ear.

In view of allegations and evidence of negligence of appellee Simms, including violation or violations of Maryland statutes, and the evidence of possible negligence of appellant, the record presents conflicting versions of the events the resolution of which involves passing on credibility of witnesses and reconciling conflicts in the description of events which occurred within a few seconds. These are not issues which may be withdrawn from the jury. Therefore the judgment of the District Court must be vacated and the case remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

320 F.2d 750, 116 U.S. App. D.C. 28, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jessie-g-mcknight-v-ella-neal-and-john-h-simms-cadc-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack