Jessie A. Gandy v. State of Florida
This text of Jessie A. Gandy v. State of Florida (Jessie A. Gandy v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 5D2023-3132 LT Case No. 2023-CT-1463-A _____________________________
JESSIE A. GANDY,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the County Court for Putnam County. Anne Marie Gennusa, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Teresa D. Sutton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R. Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
May 24, 2024
PER CURIAM.
We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence, but we remand for a corrected costs judgment striking the $50 cost of investigation because it was not part of the plea agreement, requested by the State, or orally pronounced. See Giddens v. State, 338 So. 3d 424, 424 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022). AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.
MAKAR, KILBANE, and PRATT, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jessie A. Gandy v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jessie-a-gandy-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.