Jessica Campbell v. Maged Gergawy

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: July 31, 2025
• Docket: 13-25-00072-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-25-00072-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

JESSICA CAMPBELL, Appellant,

v.

MAGED GERGAWY, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Fonseca Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Tijerina

This matter is before the court on appellant’s failure to file a brief.1 Appellant’s brief

was due to be filed on or before May 9, 2025. On May 27, 2025, the Clerk of the Court

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Second Court of Appeals in Fort Worth pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. notified appellant that her brief was past due. Appellant was further notified that if she

failed to reasonably explain the failure to file a brief within ten days from the date of the

notice, the appeal shall be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),

(c).

On June 23, 2025, the Clerk of the Court sent appellant notice that her brief was

past due. Appellant was further notified that if she failed to reasonably explain the failure

to file a brief within ten days from the date of the notice, the appeal shall be dismissed for

want of prosecution. See id. This notice was entitled final notice and was sent via email

and certified mail return receipt requested. On July 14, 2025, the clerk’s final notice was

returned to sender and marked “return to sender,” “attempted-not known,” and “unable to

forward.”

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.1(b) requires unrepresented parties to sign

any document filed and “give the party’s mailing address, telephone number, fax number,

if any, and email address.” See id. R. 9.1(b). The clerk’s office does not have a telephone

number for appellant, and the district clerk did not have any additional contact information

for the appellant.

Furthermore, Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3 permits an appellate court,

on its own initiative after giving ten days’ notice to all parties, to dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution or for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules. See

id. R. 42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See id.

JAIME TIJERINA Chief Justice

Delivered and filed on the 31st day of July, 2025.