Jessica Byas-Lurgio v. State
This text of Jessica Byas-Lurgio v. State (Jessica Byas-Lurgio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 6, 2018.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01155-CR
JESSICA BYAS-LURGIO, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F15-76316-H
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright Opinion by Justice Brown Appellant Jessica Byas-Lurgio waived a jury trial and pleaded guilty to reckless injury to
a child causing serious bodily harm. After finding appellant guilty, the trial court assessed
punishment at ten years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she
concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the
record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573
S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meets
requirements of Anders). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant
of her right to file a pro se response, but she did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to file pro se response to
Anders brief filed by counsel).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the
appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support
the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
/Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47
171155F.U05
–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
JESSICA BYAS-LURGIO, Appellant On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-17-01155-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F15-76316-H. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Bridges and Boatright participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered this 6th day of August, 2018.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jessica Byas-Lurgio v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jessica-byas-lurgio-v-state-texapp-2018.