Jesse Willard v. C. E. Harris, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas

454 F.2d 738
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided January 31, 1972·No. 71-1579·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Upon docketing in this court, Willard was advised that we were contemplating summary affirmance of the district court’s denial of habeas corpus relief. Although he was afforded an opportunity to submit a memorandum opposing summary disposition, Willard has not responded.

We have now thoroughly reviewed the file and record in this cause and are convinced that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed for the reasons stated in its memorandum and order, reported at 336 F.Supp. 1228 (D.C.Kan., 1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jesse Willard v. C. E. Harris, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, 454 F.2d 738 (10th Cir. 1972).

454 F.2d 738 (Jesse Willard v. C. E. Harris, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Gerald Lee Eastman
758 F.2d 1315 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)