Jesse Waylon Walker v. State

Opinion

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00317-CR

No. 10-14-00318-CR

JESSE WAYLON WALKER, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 82nd District Court Falls County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 9387 and 9408

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jesse Waylon Walker appeals pro se from two plea-bargained judgments of conviction. The trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal in each case states that the defendant waived the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The judgments in each case reflect a guilty plea, and in his notices of appeal, Walker admits that he pleaded guilty under a plea bargain.

In his notices, Walker asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that he pleaded guilty “under duress by counsel,” but those are insufficient grounds for continuing these direct appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2); Pena v. State, 323 S.W.3d 522, 525-26 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2010, no pet.); Webb v. State, 244 S.W.3d 543, 547 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.).

Furthermore, sentence was imposed in each case on July 24, 2014, and his notices of appeal were filed on October 10, 2014. Walker’s notices of appeal are untimely, and we have no jurisdiction of an untimely appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1) (requiring the filing of notice of appeal within 30 days of sentence being imposed); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (no appellate jurisdiction where notice of appeal is untimely).

For the above reasons, these appeals are dismissed.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeals dismissed Opinion delivered and filed October 23, 2014 Do not publish [CRPM]

Walker v. State Page 2

Walker v. State Page 3