Jesse Stone v. State of Florida
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
JESSE STONE,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2911
[December 10, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 561991CF001442.
Jesse Stone, Bushnell, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025) (holding that, even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change in law, it does not apply retroactively to cases that were final when it was decided).
KUNTZ, C.J., FORST and SHAW, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jesse Stone v. State of Florida (Jesse Stone v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.