Jesse Reynolds v. Leroy Morgan

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 2, 2021
Docket06-21-00029-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jesse Reynolds v. Leroy Morgan (Jesse Reynolds v. Leroy Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jesse Reynolds v. Leroy Morgan, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-21-00029-CV

JESSE REYNOLDS, Appellant

V.

LEROY MORGAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court Titus County, Texas Trial Court No. C02990

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jesse Reynolds, appellant, filed a notice of appeal in this matter on April 15, 2021.

Appellant has not filed a docketing statement in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. Further, appellant has not tendered the

mandatory $205.00 filing fee associated with the appeal, see TEX. R. APP. P. 5, and has not filed

proof of indigency in lieu of a filing fee, see TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1.

“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay—at the

time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court

order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order that is just.” TEX. R. APP. P. 5.

By letter dated May 17, 2021, appellant was provided with notice of and an opportunity

to cure these defects. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). The May 17 letter further warned

appellant that, if he did not submit an adequate response to the notice by May 27, 2021, this

appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with the

above-cited rules. Appellant did not file a docketing statement, did not pay the mandatory filing

fee, and did not file proof of indigency in lieu of a filing fee. Further, we have received no

communication from appellant responsive to the May 17 correspondence. Accordingly, this

appeal is ripe for dismissal.

2 Pursuant to Rule 42.3, subsections (b) and (c), of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure,

we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Ralph K. Burgess Justice

Date Submitted: July 1, 2021 Date Decided: July 2, 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jesse Reynolds v. Leroy Morgan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesse-reynolds-v-leroy-morgan-texapp-2021.