Jesse R. Lance v. University of South Carolina
This text of 53 F.3d 328 (Jesse R. Lance v. University of South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
53 F.3d 328
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jesse R. LANCE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 94-2397.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 10, 1995.
Jesse R. Lance, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing Appellant's attempt to directly appeal an order entered by the South Carolina Supreme Court. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lance v. University of South Carolina, No. CA-94-2326-2-08BD (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 F.3d 328, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16735, 1995 WL 272569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesse-r-lance-v-university-of-south-carolina-ca4-1995.