Jesse Pierce v. United States
224 F.2d 281, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4079
Opinion
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge McNamee denying a new trial, 124 F.Supp. 264, and upon the authority of Goldman v. United States, 316 U.S. 129, 62 S.Ct. 993, 86 L.Ed. 1322; Flanders v. United States, 6 Cir., 222 F.2d 163; and Browner v. United States, 6 Cir., 215 F.2d 753.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jesse Pierce v. United States, 224 F.2d 281, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4079 (6th Cir. 1955).
224 F.2d 281 (Jesse Pierce v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harold B. Dorman v. United States
435 F.2d 385 (D.C. Circuit, 1970)
People v. Saperstein
140 N.E.2d 252 (New York Court of Appeals, 1957)
Eugene Rayson v. United States
238 F.2d 160 (Ninth Circuit, 1956)
United States v. James White and Gladys Davis
228 F.2d 832 (Seventh Circuit, 1956)