Jesse Perez v. Ricky P. Casarez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 11, 2008
Docket13-07-00252-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jesse Perez v. Ricky P. Casarez (Jesse Perez v. Ricky P. Casarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jesse Perez v. Ricky P. Casarez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-07-252-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________

JESSE PEREZ, Appellant,

v.

RICKY P. CASAREZ, Appellee. _____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court of Bee County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jesse Perez, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by

the County Court of Bee County, Texas, in cause no. 4274. Upon review of the documents

before the Court, it appeared that the order appealed from was that of a county court

regarding a small claims appeal. Judgment of a county court on the appeal is final. See

Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §28.053 (Vernon 2004). The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it did not appear that this Court has jurisdiction and notified appellant of this defect so

that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX . R. APP . P.

37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days

from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of

jurisdiction. Appellant failed to respond to the Court’s notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to correct

the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of

jurisdiction. See id. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF

JURISDICTION. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 11th day of December, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jesse Perez v. Ricky P. Casarez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesse-perez-v-ricky-p-casarez-texapp-2008.