Jesse Joe Salinas v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 6, 2014·No. 04-14-00066-CR·Published

Opinion

The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 6, 2014

No. 04-14-00066-CR

Jesse Joe SALINAS, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas Trial Court No. 12-11-00098-CRK Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

ORDER On March 4, 2014, Appellant filed several pro se documents including a motion for new trial, a motion for court-appointed counsel on his motion for new trial, a memorandum of law supporting his appeal, and an out-of-time notice of appeal. Appellant is already represented in this appeal by court-appointed counsel: Richard Briggs, 7113 San Pedro Avenue, Box 312, San Antonio, Texas 78216. Appellant does not have a right to hybrid representation. See Ex parte Taylor, 36 S.W.3d 883, 887 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). Appellant’s pro se motions are DENIED.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of March, 2014.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jesse Joe Salinas v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Jesse Joe Salinas v. State (Jesse Joe Salinas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Taylor
36 S.W.3d 883 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2001)