Jesse Hamilton v. United States

252 F.2d 862, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 298, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3795
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 6, 1958
Docket14074
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 252 F.2d 862 (Jesse Hamilton v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jesse Hamilton v. United States, 252 F.2d 862, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 298, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3795 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted appellant of manslaughter. There was evidence from which the jury could have found the following facts: At about 9:20 P.M. on January 5, 1956, appellant and the woman with whom he had been living for four years were standing on a street car loading platform on a street fairly active with traffic. Appellant struck the woman in the face several times and she fell upon the street car tracks. While she was trying to get up, a taxicab approached and, although appellant did not attempt to stop it, it did stop short and drive around the other side of the loading platform. Before the woman could get off the tracks, appellant struck her again. This time she lay motionless. Appellant still made no attempt to halt the approaching traffic or to help the woman to a place of safety. He merely walked away. Another approaching taxicab ran over her and inflicted injuries from which she died a few days later.

On this appeal appellant urges that death resulted, not from his blows, but from the independent intervening injuries inflicted by the taxicab. We think that in the total circumstances of this *863 case the jury could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the death was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of appellant’s malicious conduct.

Appellant’s other contentions disclose no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of JN
406 A.2d 1275 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1979)
Parker v. United States
406 A.2d 1275 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1979)
Benny Lurk v. United States
296 F.2d 360 (D.C. Circuit, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 F.2d 862, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 298, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesse-hamilton-v-united-states-cadc-1958.