Jesse Frisbee v. Buncombe County Detention Facility

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 25, 2023
Docket23-6294
StatusUnpublished

This text of Jesse Frisbee v. Buncombe County Detention Facility (Jesse Frisbee v. Buncombe County Detention Facility) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jesse Frisbee v. Buncombe County Detention Facility, (4th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6294 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/25/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6294

JESSE N. FRISBEE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BUNCOMBE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER OWENS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:23-cv-00011-MR)

Submitted: July 20, 2023 Decided: July 25, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesse N. Frisbee, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6294 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/25/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Jesse N. Frisbee appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of standing the

42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint Frisbee purported to bring on behalf of his deceased mother.

The court dismissed the action because Frisbee failed to allege that he is the personal

representative of his mother’s estate, as required to bring a wrongful death action under

North Carolina law. See Williams v. Bradshaw, 459 F.3d 846, 848 (8th Cir. 2006)

(explaining that “[f]ederal courts are to apply state law in deciding who may bring a § 1983

action on a decedent’s behalf”). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Frisbee v. Buncombe Cnty. Det. Facility,

No. 1:23-cv-00011-MR (W.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2023). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Bradshaw
459 F.3d 846 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jesse Frisbee v. Buncombe County Detention Facility, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesse-frisbee-v-buncombe-county-detention-facility-ca4-2023.