Jesse Chavez v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 24, 2023
Docket14-22-00801-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jesse Chavez v. the State of Texas (Jesse Chavez v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jesse Chavez v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Appeal dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 24, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00801-CR

JESSE CHAVEZ, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1606246

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child under 14 years of age and sentenced to a twenty-year term of incarceration on August 10, 2022. Appellant has appealed from his judgment of conviction in cause number 14-22- 00605-CR, which remains pending before this court. This appeal, however, is from an order denying appellant’s motion for new trial, signed October 21, 2022. That order is not itself appealable. See Hernandez v. State, No. 03-11-00673-CR, 2012 WL 254606, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 25, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (collecting cases and acknowledging the court “ha[s] found no constitutional or statutory provision granting Texas courts of appeals jurisdiction over a trial court’s post-judgment ruling denying a motion for new trial”). Nguyen v. State, No. 14-11-00545-CR, 2011 WL 2650737, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] July 7, 2011, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (“An appeal from the denial of a motion for new trial, separate and apart from an appeal from the conviction, is . . . improper.”).

On December 20, 2022 the parties were notified that the court would consider dismissal of the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant demonstrated that the court has jurisdiction. Appellant has filed no response.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Wilson.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jesse Chavez v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesse-chavez-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.