Jesse Barini Anassi v. Office of Attorney General

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 24, 2021
Docket01-21-00296-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jesse Barini Anassi v. Office of Attorney General (Jesse Barini Anassi v. Office of Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jesse Barini Anassi v. Office of Attorney General, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISMISS APPEAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Appellate case name: Jesse Barini Anassi v. Office of Attorney General

Appellate case number: 01-21-00296-CV

Trial court case number: 2020-23821

Trial court: 247th District Court of Harris County

The final judgment in this case was signed on August 14, 2020. Appellant filed a motion for new trial on August 27, 2020, which extended the deadline to file a notice of appeal until ninety days after the final judgment was signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. On March 3, 2021, appellant filed a motion to vacate the judgment. On May 20, 2021, the trial court signed an order denying appellant’s motion to vacate. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on June 7, 2021, stating that he was appealing the trial court’s order denying his motion to vacate. The order denying a motion to vacate is not an appealable order. See Garza v. Hibernia Nat’l Bank, 227 S.W.3d 233, 233 n. 1–2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.) (holding that order denying motion to vacate is not independently appealable); see also Blank v. Nuszen, No. 01-18-00379-CV, 2019 WL 3783326, at * (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 13, 2019, no pet.) (citing to Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) for proposition that trial court order denying motion to vacate is not appealable or final judgment because it does not dispose of all parties and claims). Even if we were to construe appellant’s notice of appeal as a bona fide attempt to appeal from the final judgment signed on August 14, 2020, the notice of appeal was filed too late to confer jurisdiction on this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b) (filing of notice of appeal invokes appellate court’s jurisdiction); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (once time has passed for extending deadline for filing notice of appeal, party can no longer invoke appellate court’s jurisdiction). Accordingly, the Court intends to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, unless appellant files a response within ten days, citing to authority and the record, establishing this Court’s jurisdiction over this appeal. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ______/s/ Richard Hightower_____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ____August 24, 2021_____

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garza v. Hibernia National Bank
227 S.W.3d 233 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jesse Barini Anassi v. Office of Attorney General, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesse-barini-anassi-v-office-of-attorney-general-texapp-2021.