Jesse Antonio Gaitan v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 27, 2012
Docket07-12-00049-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jesse Antonio Gaitan v. State (Jesse Antonio Gaitan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jesse Antonio Gaitan v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NO. 07-12-0049-CR NO. 07-12-0050-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MARCH 27, 2012 ______________________________

JESSE ANTONIO GAITAN,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellees ______________________________

FROM THE 271st DISTRICT COURT OF WISE COUNTY;

NOS. CR16105 and CR16106; HON. JOHN H. FOSTEL, PRESIDING _______________________________

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellant Jesse Antonio Gaitan appeals from his convictions for the offenses of tamper/fabricate physical evidence with intent to impair and unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon. On January 12, 2012, the clerks records were filed. On January 20, 2012, the reporter filed extensions of time to file the records, which were granted by the Second Court of Appeals to March 16, 2012, with the provision that "no further request for extension of time should be necessary." On January 26, 2012, these cases were transferred to the Seventh Court of Appeals. To date, no status report or reporters records have been filed. Accordingly, we abate these appeals and remand the causes to the 271st District Court of Wise County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine: when the reporters records can reasonably be transcribed into written form and filed in a manner that does not further delay the prosecution of this appeal or have the practical effect of depriving the appellant of his right to appeal.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issue, 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerks record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cause to be developed a reporters record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing, if any. Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental clerks and reporters records transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this court on or before April 19, 2012. Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before April 19, 2012. It is so ordered. Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jesse Antonio Gaitan v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesse-antonio-gaitan-v-state-texapp-2012.