Jesse Andrews v. Kevin Chappell
This text of Jesse Andrews v. Kevin Chappell (Jesse Andrews v. Kevin Chappell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 26 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JESSE JAMES ANDREWS, No. 09-99012
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:02-CV-08969-R Central District of California, v. Los Angeles
RON DAVIS, ORDER
Respondent-Appellee.
JESSE JAMES ANDREWS, No. 09-99013
Petitioner-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:02-CV-08969-R
v.
RON DAVIS,
Respondent-Appellant.
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure
35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Graber did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jesse Andrews v. Kevin Chappell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesse-andrews-v-kevin-chappell-ca9-2018.