Jesse Andrews v. Kevin Chappell
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 26 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JESSE JAMES ANDREWS, No. 09-99012
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:02-CV-08969-R Central District of California, v. Los Angeles
RON DAVIS, ORDER Respondent-Appellee.
JESSE JAMES ANDREWS, No. 09-99013 Petitioner-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:02-CV-08969-R v. RON DAVIS, Respondent-Appellant.
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Graber did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jesse Andrews v. Kevin Chappell (Jesse Andrews v. Kevin Chappell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.