Jesse Allen Griffin v. the State of Texas
This text of Jesse Allen Griffin v. the State of Texas (Jesse Allen Griffin v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
________________ NO. 09-22-00074-CR NO. 09-22-00075-CR ________________
JESSE ALLEN GRIFFIN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
________________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 128th District Court Orange County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. A200433-R and A200436-R ________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jesse Allen Griffin pled guilty to two counts of intoxication manslaughter. See
Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.08(b). Under the terms of the plea, Griffin made no
agreement regarding punishment. After a bench trial regarding punishment only, the
trial court sentenced Griffin to 14 years’ incarceration for each count, to run
consecutively.
1 In three issues on appeal, Griffin argues that the trial court violated article
26.13 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the trial court misled him by
misinforming him of the correct punishment range, and his plea was involuntary.
The State concedes error as to the first issue. The State agrees that Griffin’s
conviction and sentence should be reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Per Griffin’s written plea admonishments, Griffin was advised by the trial
court that since he was pleading guilty to a third-degree felony, he faced a
punishment range of “[a] term of not more than 10 years or less than 2 years in
TDCJ[.]” The trial court then sentenced Griffin to 14 years’ incarceration. This
sentence is in violation of Article 26.13(a)(1) of the Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure that requires a defendant in a “plea of guilty…shall” be admonished of
“the range of punishment attached to the offense.” See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann.
art. 26.13.
We sustain Griffin’s first issue; we reverse and remand the judgments of the
court for a new trial.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
________________________________ JAY WRIGHT Justice Submitted on May 18, 2023 Opinion Delivered May 31, 2023 Do Not Publish
Before Horton, Johnson, and Wright, JJ. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jesse Allen Griffin v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesse-allen-griffin-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.