Jessamy v. Parkmed Associates

306 A.D.2d 33, 759 N.Y.S.2d 670, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6309
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jessamy v. Parkmed Associates. Read the opinion of the Court — 306 A.D.2d 34

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice Bowman, J.), entered March 4, 2002, which granted the motion of third-party defendant Betty Schwartz, as executrix of the estate of Peter Schwartz (defendant Schwartz), to dismiss the third-party complaint against the estate on the ground of laches, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the third-party complaint reinstated.

The court’s finding that the delay in the commencement of the third-party action caused prejudice to the third-party defendant is not supported by the record. The estate’s claims that it will take time to locate many of the now scattered witnesses who will need to be deposed and that, because Schwartz is long dead, “his own records [have] likely [been] disposed of’ are insufficient to demonstrate actual prejudice. The estate also fails to identify any record relevant to its defense that was maintained personally by Schwartz in addition to the official records maintained by defendant Parkmed, the clinic at which Schwartz operated on plaintiff pursuant to a contract with the [34]*34partnership, in which he was a partner, that performed all medical care and services for Parkmed’s patients. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jessamy v. Parkmed Associates, 306 A.D.2d 33, 759 N.Y.S.2d 670, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6309 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

306 A.D.2d 33 (Jessamy v. Parkmed Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.