Jess Frank Brown v. United States

368 F.2d 573
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 21, 1966
Docket23297_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 368 F.2d 573 (Jess Frank Brown v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jess Frank Brown v. United States, 368 F.2d 573 (5th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking relief from a conviction and sentence imposed after a plea of guilty to a violation of the Dyer Act. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. The question here seems to be the same as that which was presented by Marvel v. United States, 380 U.S. 262, 85 S.Ct. 953, 13 L.Ed.2d 960. Following the precedent of that decision, the judgment of the district court is vacated and the cause remanded for a hearing as to whether the appellant was misled by the trial judge as to the maximum sentence.

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richard Gonzalez James v. United States
388 F.2d 453 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
368 F.2d 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jess-frank-brown-v-united-states-ca5-1966.