Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co., Inc.

Ninth Circuit

Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co., Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 13, 2005

Docket03-15045

StatusPublished

This text of Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co., Inc. (Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co., Inc., (9th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 13 2005

CATHY A. CATTERSON, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

DARLENE JESPERSEN, No. 03-15045

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-01-00401-ECR

v. ORDER HARRAH’S OPERATING COMPANY, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of

this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to

Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent

by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent

adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI