Jervis v. State

455 So. 2d 1320, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1998, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15094
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 1984·No. No. 83-1415·Published

Opinion

BASKIN, Judge.

Defendant Donald Jervis represented himself in a non-jury trial. He was convicted of unlawful possession of a short-barreled rifle and received a sentence of 90 days in the Dade County Jail as a condition of a three-year term of probation. We reverse.

The record reflects that the trial court failed to conduct an adequate inquiry prior to accepting defendant Jervis’s waiver of counsel. Felton v. State, 438 So.2d 1049 (Fla.3d DCA 1983). As a result, we are unable to conclude that Jervis’s relinquishment of his right to counsel was knowing and intelligent. Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). In addition, the record fails to disclose that his uncounseled waiver of jury trial was knowing and intelligent. Enrique v. State, 408 So.2d 635 (Fla.3d DCA 1981), review denied, 418 So.2d 1280 (Fla.1982).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jervis v. State, 455 So. 2d 1320, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1998, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15094 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

455 So. 2d 1320 (Jervis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Faretta v. California
422 U.S. 806 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Felton v. State
438 So. 2d 1049 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Enrique v. State
408 So. 2d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)