Jerus v. Honda Corporation

Opinion

1 2 3 4 8 JANET A. JERUS, Case No. 20-cv-01931-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO 10 Vv. DISTRICT JUDGE 11 HONDA CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

13 14 Defendants Honda of Stevens Creek and Joe Spurrier have moved to dismiss the 3 15 complaint. Dkt. No. 6. Neither these defendants nor the plaintiff, Janet Jerus, have consented to a 16 || proceed before a magistrate judge. Moreover, several defendants have not appeared and there is 3 17 || no indication that they have been served. Absent the consent of all parties, this Court does not S 18 || have jurisdiction over this matter and must refer the case to a district judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636; 19 Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500 (9th Cir. 2017). 20 Accordingly, it is ordered that this case be reassigned to a district judge. All pending 21 motion hearings and scheduled appearances are hereby vacated and will be reset by the newly 22 assigned judge. Upon full consent of all parties, this case may be reassigned back to the 23 undersigned magistrate judge. 25 Dated: May 26, 2020 26 27 Uniginia.Z el □ VIRGINIA K. DEMARCH 28 United States Magistrate Judge