Jerus v. Honda Corporation

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 8 JANET A. JERUS, Case No. 20-cv-01931-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO 10 Vv. DISTRICT JUDGE 11 HONDA CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

13 14 Defendants Honda of Stevens Creek and Joe Spurrier have moved to dismiss the 3 15 complaint. Dkt. No. 6. Neither these defendants nor the plaintiff, Janet Jerus, have consented to a 16 || proceed before a magistrate judge. Moreover, several defendants have not appeared and there is 3 17 || no indication that they have been served. Absent the consent of all parties, this Court does not S 18 || have jurisdiction over this matter and must refer the case to a district judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636; 19 || Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500 (9th Cir. 2017). 20 Accordingly, it is ordered that this case be reassigned to a district judge. All pending 21 motion hearings and scheduled appearances are hereby vacated and will be reset by the newly 22 || assigned judge. Upon full consent of all parties, this case may be reassigned back to the 23 || undersigned magistrate judge. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: May 26, 2020 26 27 Uniginia.Z el □ VIRGINIA K. DEMARCH 28 United States Magistrate Judge