Jersey Shore Trust Co. v. Sebring
This text of 236 A.D. 713 (Jersey Shore Trust Co. v. Sebring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts on the ground that there was error in directing a verdict for the defendant before ruling on the plaintiff’s motion for the direction of a verdict in his favor, and on the further ground that the directed verdict, in so far as it finds that the trade acceptance was paid by Wentz and became the property of Wentz, was against the weight of the evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D. 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jersey-shore-trust-co-v-sebring-nyappdiv-1932.