Jersey Maid Ice Cream Co. v. Bannon

Indiana Court of Appeals

Jersey Maid Ice Cream Co. v. Bannon

169 N.E.2d 215, 131 Ind. App. 59, 1960 Ind. App. LEXIS 155

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 23, 1960

DocketNo. 19,470

StatusPublished

This text of 169 N.E.2d 215 (Jersey Maid Ice Cream Co. v. Bannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jersey Maid Ice Cream Co. v. Bannon, 169 N.E.2d 215, 131 Ind. App. 59, 1960 Ind. App. LEXIS 155 (Ind. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Bierly, C. J.

A decree was rendered in the Lake Circuit Court in favor of appellees, and subsequently a motion for a new trial was filed which was overruled [60]*60by the court on February 4, 1960. On the basis of a Praecipe, timely filed, requesting a Transcript of all the proceedings and all bills of exceptions, said Transcript and Assignment of Errors were due by April 4, 1960. A motion for extension of time to file the Transcript and Assignment of Errors was filed within the time permitted by the rules. Extension of time was granted to and including July 5, 1960. No further action was taken by the appellants in this cause.

Failure of appellants to comply with Rule 2-2 in reference to the time within which to file a Transcript and Assignment of Errors prevents further action by the appellants and no question is presented in this cause nor can any question be presented for decision, 55 Ind. App. 577.

Failure of appellants to perfect their appeal within the time prescribed by the rules, this case is now ordered stricken from the record and terminated with costs, if any, assessed against the appellants.

Note. — Reported in 169 N. E. 2d 215.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bierly, C. J.

A decree was rendered in the Lake Circuit Court in favor of appellees, and subsequently a motion for a new trial was filed which was overruled [60]*60by the court on February 4, 1960. On the basis of a Praecipe, timely filed, requesting a Transcript of all the proceedings and all bills of exceptions, said Transcript and Assignment of Errors were due by April 4, 1960. A motion for extension of time to file the Transcript and Assignment of Errors was filed within the time permitted by the rules. Extension of time was granted to and including July 5, 1960. No further action was taken by the appellants in this cause.

Failure of appellants to comply with Rule 2-2 in reference to the time within which to file a Transcript and Assignment of Errors prevents further action by the appellants and no question is presented in this cause nor can any question be presented for decision, 55 Ind. App. 577.

Failure of appellants to perfect their appeal within the time prescribed by the rules, this case is now ordered stricken from the record and terminated with costs, if any, assessed against the appellants.

Note. — Reported in 169 N. E. 2d 215.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 N.E.2d 215, 131 Ind. App. 59, 1960 Ind. App. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jersey-maid-ice-cream-co-v-bannon-indctapp-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack