Home/D.C. Circuit/Jersey Central Power and Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Jersey Central Power and Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

776 F.2d 364, 249 U.S. App. D.C. 398
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided October 18, 1985·No. 82-2004·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The suggestion for rehearing en banc of intervenors Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc., et ah, has been circulated to the full Court. A vote was requested thereon, and a majority of the active judges of the Court have voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the aforesaid suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the opinion and judgment of August 2, 1985, 768 F.2d 1500, be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order will govern proceedings before the en banc Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jersey Central Power and Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 776 F.2d 364, 249 U.S. App. D.C. 398 (D.C. Cir. 1985).

776 F.2d 364 (Jersey Central Power and Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mississippi Power Co. v. Mississippi Public Service Commission
168 So. 3d 905 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2015)
Mississippi Power Company, Inc. v. Mississippi Public Service Commission
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2015
Jersey Central Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc., Intervenors
768 F.2d 1500 (D.C. Circuit, 1985)