Jerry Yates v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Clinchfield Coal Company

60 F.3d 827, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24727, 1995 WL 386503
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 30, 1995
Docket93-2579
StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 827 (Jerry Yates v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Clinchfield Coal Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jerry Yates v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Clinchfield Coal Company, 60 F.3d 827, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24727, 1995 WL 386503 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

60 F.3d 827
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jerry YATES, Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United
States Department of Labor; Clinchfield Coal
Company, Respondents.

No. 93-2579.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 18, 1995.
Decided June 30, 1995.

Jerry Yates, Petitioner Pro Se.

Patricia May Nece and Alan G. Paez, Washington, DC

Michael Francis Blair, Abingdon, VA

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1994). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Yates v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, No. 92-1698-BLA (B.R.B. Nov. 23, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 F.3d 827, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24727, 1995 WL 386503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerry-yates-v-director-office-of-workers-compensat-ca4-1995.