Jerry Stull v. United States of America

E.D. Virginia

Jerry Stull v. United States of America

DecidedOctober 16, 2025

Docket3:25-cv-00707

StatusUnknown

This text of Jerry Stull v. United States of America (Jerry Stull v. United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jerry Stull v. United States of America, (E.D. Va. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division JERRY STULL, ) Petitioner, Civil Action No. 3:25-cv-707-HEH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Without Prejudice) Petitioner, Jerry Stull, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, submitted a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition (“§ 2241 Petition,” ECF No. 1) to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (“Pennsylvania District Court”).! By Order entered on September 2, 2025, the Pennsylvania District Court concluded the § 2241 Petition was in fact and substance a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and transferred the § 2241 Petition to this Court. (ECF No. 3.) Stull, however, already has a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion pending in his criminal case in the Newport News Division of this Court. (United States v. Stull, 4:23-cr-89-HEH-1 (E.D. Va.), ECF No. 41.) The relevant statutes governing 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions do not permit individuals to litigate multiple 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions simultaneously. Furthermore, the Court is reluctant to convert his § 2241 Petition into a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Cf

' Stull pled guilty in the United States District for the Eastern District of Virginia, Newport News Division, without the benefit of plea agreement, to possession of firearm by a felon. United States v. Stull, No. 24-4340, 2025 WL 2269774, at *1 (4th Cir. Aug. 8, 2025).

United States v. Blackstock, 513 F.3d 128, 132-33 (4th Cir. 2008) (explaining that the district court must advise inmates of the consequences of filing a § 2255 motion before converting a mislabeled post-conviction motion into a motion pursuant to § 2255). Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the § 2241 Petition without prejudice to Stull’s filing of a single, amended 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion raising all his claims that he wishes to raise in his criminal case in the Newport News Division of this Court. An appropriate Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

VN Date: Bet le 2626 Henry E. Hudson Richmond, Virginia Senior United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division JERRY STULL, ) Petitioner, Civil Action No. 3:25-cv-707-HEH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Without Prejudice) Petitioner, Jerry Stull, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, submitted a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition (“§ 2241 Petition,” ECF No. 1) to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (“Pennsylvania District Court”).! By Order entered on September 2, 2025, the Pennsylvania District Court concluded the § 2241 Petition was in fact and substance a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and transferred the § 2241 Petition to this Court. (ECF No. 3.) Stull, however, already has a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion pending in his criminal case in the Newport News Division of this Court. (United States v. Stull, 4:23-cr-89-HEH-1 (E.D. Va.), ECF No. 41.) The relevant statutes governing 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions do not permit individuals to litigate multiple 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions simultaneously. Furthermore, the Court is reluctant to convert his § 2241 Petition into a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Cf

' Stull pled guilty in the United States District for the Eastern District of Virginia, Newport News Division, without the benefit of plea agreement, to possession of firearm by a felon. United States v. Stull, No. 24-4340, 2025 WL 2269774, at *1 (4th Cir. Aug. 8, 2025).

United States v. Blackstock, 513 F.3d 128, 132-33 (4th Cir. 2008) (explaining that the district court must advise inmates of the consequences of filing a § 2255 motion before converting a mislabeled post-conviction motion into a motion pursuant to § 2255). Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the § 2241 Petition without prejudice to Stull’s filing of a single, amended 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion raising all his claims that he wishes to raise in his criminal case in the Newport News Division of this Court. An appropriate Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

VN Date: Bet le 2626 Henry E. Hudson Richmond, Virginia Senior United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jerry Stull v. United States of America, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerry-stull-v-united-states-of-america-vaed-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack