Jerry Stephen Bobinger v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 3, 2007
Docket14-07-00478-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jerry Stephen Bobinger v. State (Jerry Stephen Bobinger v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jerry Stephen Bobinger v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 3, 2007

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 3, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-07-00478-CR

JERRY STEPHEN BOBINJER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1104423

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a guilty plea to felony driving while intoxicated.  In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on May 4, 2007, to confinement for eleven years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.  We dismiss the appeal. 


Appellant=s notice of appeal was not file stamped until June 6, 2007, more than 30 days after sentence was imposed.  A defendant=s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).  Although appellant=s cover letter is dated May 30, 2007, the envelope bears a post mark of June 5, 2007.  To be timely, the notice of appeal must have been deposited in the mail by June 4, 2007.  See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1, 9.2(b) & 26.2.(a).  A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction.  Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).  If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal.  Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal.  Id.

In addition, the trial court entered a certification of the defendant=s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  The trial court=s certification is included in the record on appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).  The record supports the trial court=s certification.  See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed July 3, 2007.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Hudson and Guzman.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jerry Stephen Bobinger v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerry-stephen-bobinger-v-state-texapp-2007.