Jerry Kathleen Ballard and James R. Ballard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Leslie R. Vincent a/k/a Leslie Vincent Daigle

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 6, 2020
Docket2019CW1210
StatusUnknown

This text of Jerry Kathleen Ballard and James R. Ballard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Leslie R. Vincent a/k/a Leslie Vincent Daigle (Jerry Kathleen Ballard and James R. Ballard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Leslie R. Vincent a/k/a Leslie Vincent Daigle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jerry Kathleen Ballard and James R. Ballard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Leslie R. Vincent a/k/a Leslie Vincent Daigle, (La. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

JERRY KATHLEEN BALLARD AND NO. 2019 CW 1210 JAMES R. BALLARD

VERSUS

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY AND LESLIE R. VINCENT A/ K/ A LESLIE JAN 0 6 2020 VINCENT DAIGLE

In Re. Jerry Kathleen Ballard and James R. Ballard, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 2018- 13848.

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., GUIDRY AND PENZATQ, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. When a judgment dismisses all claims against

a party, it is a final judgment that is immediately appealable

under La. Code Civ. P. art. 1915( A)( 1) and ( A)( 3). Appellate courts do not generally review appealable judgments under their

supervisory jurisdiction. See In re Howard, 541 So. 2d 195, 196- 97 ( La. 1989) ( per curiam). However, a valid judgment must be precise, definite, and certain." Laird v. St. Tammany Parish Safe Harbor, 2002- 0045 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 12/ 20/ 02), 836 So. 2d 364, 365. Moreover, a final appealable judgment must contain decretal language, and it must name the party in favor of whom

the ruling is ordered, the party against whom the is ruling ordered, and the relief that is granted or denied. See Carter V. Williamson Eye Center, 2001- 2016 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 11/ 27/ 02), 837 So. 2d 43, 44. These determinations should be evident from the language of a judgment without reference to other documents in the record, such as pleadings and reasons for judgment. Laird, 836 So. 2d at 366. Accordingly herein, once a judgment with appropriate decretal language, and not referring to an extrinsic pleading, is issued by the district court, such

a ruling will represent a final, appealable judgment.

VGW JMG AHP

r

DEPUTY LERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Howard
541 So. 2d 195 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1989)
Carter v. Williamson Eye Center
837 So. 2d 43 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)
Laird v. St. Tammany Parish Safe Harbor
836 So. 2d 364 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jerry Kathleen Ballard and James R. Ballard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Leslie R. Vincent a/k/a Leslie Vincent Daigle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerry-kathleen-ballard-and-james-r-ballard-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-lactapp-2020.