Jerry J. Kilpatrick v. Samuel H. Houston

264 F.3d 1039, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19418, 2001 WL 1001131
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 31, 2001·No. 99-10862·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

Before BLACK, GODBOLD and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner-Appellee has been released from custody. This appeal is therefore moot. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, and this case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to dismiss the petition as moot. See Bekier v. Bekier, 248 F.3d 1051, 1055-56 (11th Cir.2001) (“‘Where a case becomes moot after the district court enters judgment but before the appellate court has issued a decision, the appellate court must dismiss the appeal, vacate the district court’s judgment, and remand with instructions to dismiss as moot.’”) (quoting United States v. Ghandtchi, 705 F.2d 1315, 1316 (11th Cir.1986)).

DISMISSED and REMANDED with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jerry J. Kilpatrick v. Samuel H. Houston, 264 F.3d 1039, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19418, 2001 WL 1001131 (11th Cir. 2001).

264 F.3d 1039 (Jerry J. Kilpatrick v. Samuel H. Houston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related