Jerry J. Kilpatrick v. Samuel H. Houston
This text of 264 F.3d 1039 (Jerry J. Kilpatrick v. Samuel H. Houston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Petitioner-Appellee has been released from custody. This appeal is therefore moot. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, and this case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to dismiss the petition as moot. See Bekier v. Bekier, 248 F.3d 1051, 1055-56 (11th Cir.2001) (“‘Where a case becomes moot after the district court enters judgment but before the appellate court has issued a decision, the appellate court must dismiss the appeal, vacate the district court’s judgment, and remand with instructions to dismiss as moot.’”) (quoting United States v. Ghandtchi, 705 F.2d 1315, 1316 (11th Cir.1986)).
DISMISSED and REMANDED with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 F.3d 1039, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19418, 2001 WL 1001131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerry-j-kilpatrick-v-samuel-h-houston-ca11-2001.