Jerry Donaldson v. Kansas City Southern Railway

Eighth Circuit

Jerry Donaldson v. Kansas City Southern Railway

888 F.3d 956

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedApril 26, 2018

Docket17-2039

StatusPublished

This text of 888 F.3d 956 (Jerry Donaldson v. Kansas City Southern Railway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jerry Donaldson v. Kansas City Southern Railway, 888 F.3d 956 (8th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this diversity action, Jerry Donaldson appeals the adverse summary judgment decision issued by the district court in favor of Kansas City Southern Railway (Southern) as to Donaldson's claim that Southern negligently maintained the roadway at a crossing where its three tracks intersected a state highway.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Donaldson, we conclude that he established a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Southern negligently maintained the pavement. See W. Heritage Ins. Co. v. Asphalt Wizards , 795 F.3d 832 , 836-37 (8th Cir. 2015) ; Depositors Ins. Co. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , 506 F.3d 1092 , 1094 (8th Cir. 2007). While Ark. Code Ann. § 27-67-214 (b) limits Southern's liability to maintain "that part of the roadway between [its] tracks and to the end of the cross ties on each side," the case law interpreting the statute does not clearly indicate whether the area between the cross ties is covered. Cf. Untiedt v. St. Louis Sw. Ry. Co. , 246 Ark. 941 , 440 S.W.2d 251 , 255 (Ark. 1969) (noting the duty of railroad company to maintain roadway is limited to portion of roadway between its tracks and to end of cross ties on each side). The district court may need to predict how the Arkansas Supreme Court would interpret the statute. See Jackson v. Anchor Packing Co. , 994 F.2d 1295 , 1301 (8th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, we reverse the district court's summary judgment decision, and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this diversity action, Jerry Donaldson appeals the adverse summary judgment decision issued by the district court in favor of Kansas City Southern Railway (Southern) as to Donaldson's claim that Southern negligently maintained the roadway at a crossing where its three tracks intersected a state highway.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Donaldson, we conclude that he established a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Southern negligently maintained the pavement. See W. Heritage Ins. Co. v. Asphalt Wizards , 795 F.3d 832 , 836-37 (8th Cir. 2015) ; Depositors Ins. Co. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , 506 F.3d 1092 , 1094 (8th Cir. 2007). While Ark. Code Ann. § 27-67-214 (b) limits Southern's liability to maintain "that part of the roadway between [its] tracks and to the end of the cross ties on each side," the case law interpreting the statute does not clearly indicate whether the area between the cross ties is covered. Cf. Untiedt v. St. Louis Sw. Ry. Co. , 246 Ark. 941 , 440 S.W.2d 251 , 255 (Ark. 1969) (noting the duty of railroad company to maintain roadway is limited to portion of roadway between its tracks and to end of cross ties on each side). The district court may need to predict how the Arkansas Supreme Court would interpret the statute. See Jackson v. Anchor Packing Co. , 994 F.2d 1295 , 1301 (8th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, we reverse the district court's summary judgment decision, and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

888 F.3d 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerry-donaldson-v-kansas-city-southern-railway-ca8-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack