Jerry Bert Braun v. Roger F. Scott, Warden

938 F.2d 1032, 91 Daily Journal DAR 8421, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14656
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jerry Bert Braun v. Roger F. Scott, Warden. Read the opinion of the Court — 927 F.2d 1516
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 12, 1991·No. 89-15726·Published

Opinion

938 F.2d 1032

Jerry Bert BRAUN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Roger F. SCOTT, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 89-15726.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted En Banc June 20, 1991.
Decided July 12, 1991.

Mary E. Berkheiser, Meyer, Hendricks, Victor, Osborn & Maledon, Phoenix, Ariz., for petitioner-appellant.

Joseph Douglas Wilson, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Gerald S. Frank, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; Alfredo C. Marquez, District Judge, Presiding.

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, NORRIS, REINHARDT, HALL, THOMPSON, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, and THOMAS G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The appeal in this case is dismissed as moot. The district court's judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded with instructions to dismiss the action. See Funbus Systems, Inc. v. California Public Utilities Commission, 801 F.2d 1120, 1131-32 (9th Cir.1986).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jerry Bert Braun v. Roger F. Scott, Warden, 938 F.2d 1032, 91 Daily Journal DAR 8421, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14656 (9th Cir. 1991).

938 F.2d 1032 (Jerry Bert Braun v. Roger F. Scott, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Braun v. Scott
938 F.2d 1032 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)