Jerrold Schroeder v. Jack Chivatero
This text of 876 F.2d 895 (Jerrold Schroeder v. Jack Chivatero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Jerrold SCHROEDER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jack CHIVATERO, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-3766.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 14, 1989.
Before KEITH and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges and BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from the order of the district court granting summary judgment to defendants.
Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are unable to say that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED upon the reasoning set forth in its memorandum opinion of July 29, 1988.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
876 F.2d 895, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8609, 1989 WL 63324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerrold-schroeder-v-jack-chivatero-ca6-1989.