Jerris Harris v. the State of Texas
This text of Jerris Harris v. the State of Texas (Jerris Harris v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00289-CR
Jerris Harris, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 299TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-DC-20-900078, THE HONORABLE KAREN SAGE, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Jerris Harris has filed a notice of appeal from his conviction for the
offense of aggravated sexual assault. Harris appears to be indigent, as his notice of appeal
reflects that he was appointed appellate counsel in the court below. Appellant has filed a motion
to allow appointed counsel to withdraw as attorney of record and to allow substitute counsel to
serve as attorney of record instead.
The trial court has the responsibility for appointing counsel to represent indigent
defendants on appeal as well as the authority to relieve or replace appointed counsel upon a
finding of good cause. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. arts. 1.051(d), (k)(2), 26.04(j)(2).
Accordingly, when counsel is appointed by the trial court to represent an indigent defendant on
appeal, it is the trial court’s responsibility to relieve or replace counsel. See Alvarado v. State,
562 S.W.3d 450, 450–51 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, no pet.); Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.); Scales v. State, No. 03-23-00493-CR,
2024 WL 3841740, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 15, 2024) (order and mem. op.) (not
designated for publication).
We therefore dismiss counsel’s motion to substitute, abate the appeal, and remand
the above cause to the district court. If the district court determines that good cause exists for
replacing counsel with substitute counsel, the district court shall remove counsel and promptly
appoint substitute counsel for the appeal of this cause. A supplemental clerk’s record containing
copies of the court’s order appointing substitute counsel and the court’s order allowing counsel’s
removal shall be forwarded to this Court no later than June 27, 2025.
Before Justices Triana, Theofanis, and Crump
Abated and Remanded
Filed: May 28, 2025
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jerris Harris v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerris-harris-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.