Jerrid Damond Brunt v. State
This text of Jerrid Damond Brunt v. State (Jerrid Damond Brunt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-11-00090-CR
Jerrid Damond Brunt, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 65829, THE HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant, Jerrid Damond Brunt, pled guilty and judicially confessed to the offense of felony driving while intoxicated, a third-degree felony. (1) See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 49.04(a), 49.09(b)(2) (West 2011). He entered his plea open to the court without benefit of a plea bargain agreement as to punishment. After reviewing the pre-sentence investigation report, the trial court found Brunt guilty and assessed his punishment at confinement for ten years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.34 (West 2011).
Brunt's court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).
Brunt received a copy of counsel's brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. No pro se brief or other written response has been filed.
We have reviewed the record, including appellate counsel's brief, and find no reversible error. See Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
__________________________________________
Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin
Affirmed
Filed: November 8, 2011
Do Not Publish
1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jerrid Damond Brunt v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerrid-damond-brunt-v-state-texapp-2011.