Jerre-Graham: Kneip v. State
This text of Jerre-Graham: Kneip v. State (Jerre-Graham: Kneip v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 11, 2001
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
On November 7, 2000, Jerre Kneip's bail bond was forfeited for failure to appear. On January 2, 2001, the court entered a judgment nisi against Kneip and Davis Bonding Company and citations were issued. The record does not reflect whether either Kneip or Davis Bonding answered or appeared. On February 2, 2001, Kneip filed a notice appealing the judgment nisi. No final judgment of forfeiture has been signed.
A judgment nisi is a judicial declaration of forfeiture; it is an interlocutory judgment, not a final judgment. Hokr v. State, 545 S.W.2d 463, 465 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977). A bail bond forfeiture is not final and appealable until a final judgment, disposing of both the principal and surety, is signed. See Bostick v. State, 81 Tex. Crim. 402, 195 S.W. 863 (1917); Lozano v. State, 978 S.W.2d 645, 647-48 (Tex. App.-Eastland 1998, no pet.). We therefore dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jerre-Graham: Kneip v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerre-graham-kneip-v-state-texapp-2001.