Jeronis v. Starr

Sixth Circuit

Jeronis v. Starr

198 F.2d 73, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3143

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 10, 1952

Docket11632

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 F.2d 73 (Jeronis v. Starr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jeronis v. Starr, 198 F.2d 73, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3143 (6th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of a petition for writ of mandamus directing respondent to issue a writ of habeas corpus, the petition on its face indicates that two applications for sudh writ had previously been submitted and denied, that there is no showing that the third proceeding differs from the previous two.

Therefore, upon the authority of § 2244, Tit. 28 U.S.C. and Jackson v. Gough, 5 Cir., 170 F.2d 630, 632, it is hereby ordered that both the petition for the writ of mandamus and the petition to proceed in forma pauper-is are

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of a petition for writ of mandamus directing respondent to issue a writ of habeas corpus, the petition on its face indicates that two applications for sudh writ had previously been submitted and denied, that there is no showing that the third proceeding differs from the previous two.

Therefore, upon the authority of § 2244, Tit. 28 U.S.C. and Jackson v. Gough, 5 Cir., 170 F.2d 630, 632, it is hereby ordered that both the petition for the writ of mandamus and the petition to proceed in forma pauper-is are

Denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 F.2d 73, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeronis-v-starr-ca6-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack